INDIA-BASED · INTERNATIONAL DELIVERYsupport@maukaz.com
MAUKAZ — Your Technology Partner
Insights/Knowledge & RAG
PRACTICAL GUIDE · Knowledge & RAG

Preparing a knowledge assistant for conflicting evidence

Conflicting documents should produce an explicit conflict or an approved precedence decision. Hiding disagreement behind a fluent answer creates risk.

A practical starting point

Work through these checks in order. Use the results to decide what needs to change in your own workflow.

  1. Define source hierarchy and version rules.
  2. Expose unresolved contradictions to the responsible content owner.
  3. Explain uncertainty when a valid precedence rule is unavailable.
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

A current policy and an undated FAQ may disagree; the assistant needs a documented rule for handling that situation.

A mistake to avoid

Do not average contradictory instructions into a new invented policy.

How to check progress

Track conflicts detected and the time to resolve them at the source.

Your action checklist

Use this checklist while reviewing your own setup. Checkmarks are temporary and stay in this open page.

Need the wider workflow?

This quick note covers one decision. For a worked example, decision table and a fuller implementation workflow, read When retrieval is the right addition to an AI assistant.

Further reading

Official background resources for this topic. The workflow above is general guidance, not a guarantee of a particular result.

AI-assisted editorial content. Examples are illustrative, not client case studies. Read our editorial policy or report a correction.