Choosing the first AI workflow to pilot
In-depth guideStart with a bounded task where success can be checked and failure can be contained. High volume alone does not make a process suitable for AI.
Read the guide ↗
Choose practical AI workflows and evaluate their business value.
Worked examples, decision tables and troubleshooting to help you apply the ideas.
Start with a bounded task where success can be checked and failure can be contained. High volume alone does not make a process suitable for AI.
Read the guide ↗An AI workflow saves time only after review, correction and operation are included. Measure the complete task rather than model response speed.
Read the guide ↗Use deterministic rules when the decision is clear and stable. A language model is more useful when interpretation of varied language is genuinely required.
Read the guide ↗A pilot cannot compensate for inaccessible, contradictory or poorly owned information. Data preparation is part of the product, not an optional cleanup.
Read the guide ↗Human approval should occur before an action whose consequences exceed the system's demonstrated reliability. The reviewer needs enough context to make a real decision.
Read the guide ↗Acceptance criteria convert a promising demo into a testable proposal. Include failure conditions as well as average success.
Read the guide ↗The operating budget includes more than model usage. Integration, retrieval, monitoring, human review and maintenance can dominate the economics.
Read the guide ↗Buy when a product fits the workflow and governance needs without excessive workarounds. Build when differentiation or integration requirements justify ongoing ownership.
Read the guide ↗Adoption depends on whether the tool improves real work and fits existing responsibilities. Training cannot rescue an unreliable or poorly integrated workflow.
Read the guide ↗A pilot should end with a decision to expand, revise or stop. Define that decision before investing in a broader rollout.
Read the guide ↗A proof of concept demonstrates feasibility under selected conditions. Production requires dependable behavior across real users, failures and operational changes.
Read the guide ↗Someone must remain accountable for the result even when software produces the first draft. Define responsibility across content, operation and approval.
Read the guide ↗A useful workflow should degrade predictably when the model, retrieval service or network fails. Plan the fallback before users depend on the tool.
Read the guide ↗Understand what information leaves your systems and what contractual or technical controls apply. Evaluate the actual service configuration rather than generic marketing claims.
Read the guide ↗A small well-chosen dataset can expose important failures before a large rollout. Represent difficult and ordinary cases rather than only successful demonstrations.
Read the guide ↗A fluent answer is not evidence of certainty. Give users evidence and actionable uncertainty cues rather than treating a model's self-reported confidence as calibrated truth.
Read the guide ↗A model or prompt change can alter behavior without a traditional code change. Treat it as a release with evidence and a rollback plan.
Read the guide ↗A risk register is useful when each item has a trigger, owner and response. A long list of vague concerns rarely changes behavior.
Read the guide ↗Scope depends on data readiness, integrations, evaluation and operational obligations. Break the work into discovery and evidence-based delivery increments.
Read the guide ↗Measure the outcome the workflow exists to produce. Model-level scores can help diagnosis but should not replace business-level checks.
Read the guide ↗