Reducing friction in a project enquiry form
In-depth guideAsk for enough information to begin a useful conversation, not everything needed to deliver the project. The first form should have a clear purpose.
Read the guide ↗
Help visitors understand your offer and complete useful tasks.
Worked examples, decision tables and troubleshooting to help you apply the ideas.
Ask for enough information to begin a useful conversation, not everything needed to deliver the project. The first form should have a clear purpose.
Read the guide ↗An error message should explain the problem and the action needed to fix it. Preserve valid input so the user does not have to start again.
Read the guide ↗Mobile forms need comfortable controls, clear labels and a stable layout. Test the real keyboard and submission behavior, not only a narrow desktop window.
Read the guide ↗A confirmation page should prove the request was received and explain the next step. It can also provide helpful preparation without overselling.
Read the guide ↗Pricing information can help buyers self-qualify when its assumptions are clear. Separate starting prices from a complete project commitment.
Read the guide ↗Trust signals are useful when they answer a real buyer concern and are accurate. More badges do not compensate for unclear service information.
Read the guide ↗A service page should help a buyer understand fit, scope and the next decision. Organize it around the questions raised during evaluation.
Read the guide ↗A headline should communicate the offer and audience quickly. Test a meaningful proposition rather than cosmetic wording alone.
Read the guide ↗Low traffic makes conventional experiments difficult. Start with observable failures and usability evidence before chasing small statistical lifts.
Read the guide ↗A call to action needs clear purpose and usable interaction. Visual prominence should not come at the expense of accessibility.
Read the guide ↗Navigation should reflect the choices visitors need to make. Organize around understandable services and information rather than internal team structure.
Read the guide ↗Discovery questions should reduce uncertainty that affects delivery. Ask about outcomes and constraints before prescribing a solution.
Read the guide ↗Performance and communication should improve together. Remove unnecessary weight while preserving the information needed to evaluate the offer.
Read the guide ↗A comparison should help buyers understand options, including when your service may not fit. Clear trade-offs build a better conversation.
Read the guide ↗When a submission fails, the user needs a clear recovery path. Do not display success until the receiving system confirms acceptance.
Read the guide ↗A useful brief explains the business need and constraints without pretending every requirement is already known. It should support discovery, not replace it.
Read the guide ↗A case study should let a buyer understand relevance and evidence quickly. Structure it around the problem, constraints, work and outcome.
Read the guide ↗Handover is easier when ownership and operating responsibilities are defined early. Treat documentation and access transfer as deliverables.
Read the guide ↗Maintenance protects the site's ongoing usefulness, not only its uptime. Include content, forms, dependencies and recovery readiness.
Read the guide ↗A redesign should solve identifiable problems. A visual preference alone does not establish whether the new site works better.
Read the guide ↗